Democracy Monitor

Monitoring democratic institutions through public records

← Back to overview

Reversals

A record kept in good repair. This page is the repair log.

19 entries since July 2026: 7 corrections, 5 status changed after repairs, 2 publication helds, 2 regenerateds, 1 audit, 2 policys. Newest first.

Nothing here is quietly edited. A release that corrects, reverses, holds, or regenerates anything adds an entry before it ships.

If you think a reading of a specific document is wrong, dispute it on that document — every reviewed document carries the link. Disputes are published once reviewed, and when one changes a reading, the change appears here with your objection attached.

The record of our own changes#

This page lists every time the site corrected, reversed, held, or regenerated something it had published — with the date, the reason, and the record where each change is documented. It is updated with every release. It exists because what this site claims is licensed by conduct: the record changes when it is wrong.

Kinds: Correction — something published was wrong and was changed; Status changed after repair — a weekly status moved because the record beneath it changed; Publication held — the site declined to publish until it could count; Regenerated — model-written prose was replaced; Audit — the instrument was tested and the result published; Policy — a decision about how the record is kept.

Ledger#

DateKindWhat changedScaleWhyEvidence
Aug 31, 2026Policy
Research answers — retrieval index quality gate
The rebuilt salience index (junk case citations and extraction artifacts removed) was accepted with two aspirational pool-hygiene thresholds still unmet: 81 aliases shared across four or more questions (limit 10) and 74 documents recurring in three or more pools (limit 25).Both conditions predate the change — the previous accepted index measured 76 and 86 — and the metrics this change could have moved both improved (top-ten arm share 20%→18%, mean relevance 0.49→0.50). The cross-question tail the unmet limits measure is separately scheduled work; the owner accepted the gate under its intent and this entry records the choice.comment 1
v1.21.2
Aug 31, 2026Status changed after repair
Rulemaking — week of July 6, 2026
The week’s status changed from consistent-with-norms to notable departure, and its narrative was regenerated, after a newly ingested proclamation was read as a clear departure. The executive-actions narrative for the week of July 13 was regenerated for the same ingest (two monument proclamations); its status did not change.1Sixteen newly approved subject mappings let the Compilation of Presidential Documents route twenty previously skipped documents — emergency-power renewals, monument modifications, deregulatory orders — into the record; one of them moved a published week’s status. The repair ran under the flip gate and full validation.798777
v1.20.3
Aug 31, 2026Correction
Weekly aggregates — in-progress week
Fourteen aggregate rows created early for the in-progress week (August 31) were deleted; the weekly snapshot rebuilds them from complete data.14A repair scope mistakenly included the current week, giving it premature status rows — the same artifact corrected on August 28.777
v1.20.3
Aug 31, 2026Publication held
Weekly digest — week of 2026-08-24
The weekly digest email was held past its Monday send and released the same day, after repair.The snapshot process was killed out of memory before the digest gate ran — and the gate would have held regardless: a late-archived 2024 GAO report had been scored into a baseline week whose aggregate had not been recomputed, one derivation-graph violation. The week was re-derived under the flip gate (zero status changes), validation came back clean, and the digest went out.777
v1.20.1
Aug 29, 2026Policy
Research answers — release gate
The v1.18 retrieval release was accepted with two eval questions one item lower than the baseline (FW2, IM4).Both lost items were mentions of documents the retrieval had never returned in any run — the reordered pool stopped prompting them. No retrieved document was lost; the owner accepted the gate under its intent and the ledger records the choice.comment 1comment 2
v1.18.1
Aug 29, 2026Regenerated
Weekly narratives, January–August 2026
21 category narratives and 21 weekly summaries were regenerated; 2,030 older narratives were accepted as-is rather than regenerated.42The presidential-document backfill changed the status of 21 category-weeks, leaving narratives that said "no significant anomalies" beside weeks now at a departure status, and summaries whose category counts no longer matched the data.comment 1comment 2
v1.17.10
Aug 29, 2026Status changed after repair
Weekly statuses, January–June 2026
Twenty-one category-week statuses moved up after the backfilled presidential documents were re-derived: elections (01-12, 02-02, 02-16, 03-09, 03-16, 03-30, 06-01, 06-08), civilService (01-19, 06-01), rulemaking (01-19, 02-09, 06-01), judicialIndependence (02-16, 03-30), lawEnforcement (03-30, 06-01), executiveActions (01-05), fiscal (02-09), military (03-30), mediaFreedom (04-13). All accepted.21Those weeks had held no presidential documents at all while the ingest was stalled; the documents that arrived — Executive Orders 14399 and 14410 among them — were classified as departures.comment 1comment 2
v1.17.8
Aug 28, 2026Correction
Ingest — Compilation of Presidential Documents
Presidential documents issued between 2026-01-07 and 2026-08-28 had never been ingested; 1,018 category rows were backfilled, embedded, and reviewed.1,018The publisher loads these documents about seven weeks after their issue date; the weekly step asked only for the previous week, found nothing, and logged that as success for seven months.798comment 2
v1.17.8
Aug 28, 2026Audit
AI reviewer — political symmetry
Two hundred current-term verdicts were re-run with the administrations’ names exchanged inside the documents: 11.6% crossed the departure line net of the model’s own noise (19 toward less concerning, 3 toward more). A mirror arm of 190 Biden-era documents renamed to the current administration moved 4.2%.200Verdict rates differ sharply by era; the audit tests whether that is the record or the reviewer. Reading: fragility of borderline verdicts to any renaming, not a party tilt — published on the methodology page.comment 1comment 2comment 3
v1.17.3
Aug 28, 2026Correction
AI review annotations
Thirty-three review annotations (18 current-term, 15 baseline-era) were corrected where the reviewer’s summary misstated what the document said.33A 400-row sampled audit screened the annotations against their documents; 33 of 100 flagged rows were confirmed substantive errors and rewritten from the document text, with the owner’s approval for the baseline rows.comment 1comment 2
v1.17.1
Aug 28, 2026Correction
Court opinions — revisions
Five hundred ninety-two court-opinion rows that duplicated a revised version of the same opinion were marked superseded (never deleted) and dropped from counts; two weekly statuses moved down as a result (immigrationEnforcement 2026-04-06, lawEnforcement 2026-05-04), and seven moved up when emergency-docket orders were added.592CourtListener issues a second record when a slip opinion is revised; both had been counted. Emergency-docket orders had been excluded by the search default.comment 1comment 2
v1.17.2
Aug 28, 2026Correction
Overview — current week
Fourteen aggregate rows for the week then in progress were deleted after a repair had created them.14The repair was run through the current date rather than the last completed week, so the overview showed a partial week as the latest.DECISIONS.md
v1.17.3
Aug 28, 2026Regenerated
Weekly summaries 2026-07-20 and 2026-07-27
Two stored weekly summaries were regenerated.2Each named a number of categories and then listed a different number (“Four categories” followed by six). A deterministic number check now runs on every summary before publication.comment 1comment 2
v1.17.1
Aug 21, 2026Status changed after repair
Baseline period — GAO reports
One baseline-era weekly status changed when GAO reports were added back to 2017.1A new source is required to run uniformly across every period; the owner reviewed and accepted the single flip.739DECISIONS-ARCHIVE.md
v1.15.1
Aug 11, 2026Correction
AI review annotations
Five review annotations were corrected, beginning with one that said Executive Order 14029 “revokes Schedule F”.5Answer audits found annotations that misread their documents; the corrections were applied from the document text and the sampled audit at scale was scheduled.comment 1comment 2
Aug 10, 2026Publication held
Weekly digest
The weekly digest was held and released by hand after the missing scores were computed (also on 2026-08-03).Documents that their sources published late were stored outside the two-week scoring sweep and nothing scored them; the integrity check refused to send a digest built on unscored documents. The snapshot now reconciles unscored documents itself.667DECISIONS.md
Aug 2, 2026Status changed after repair
Baseline periods — inspector-general reports (oversight.gov)
Thirty-one baseline-era weekly statuses changed when reports from seven inspectors general were added across every period.31Uniform coverage across periods is required of every new source; the owner reviewed and accepted the flips.655DECISIONS-ARCHIVE.md
v1.5.0
Jul 30, 2026Status changed after repair
Baseline periods — congressional hearing transcripts
One hundred one baseline-era weekly statuses changed when hearing transcripts were added across every period.101Uniform coverage across periods; the owner reviewed the flips (for example, the 2018 family-separation week) and accepted them as mission-correct.DECISIONS-ARCHIVE.md
Jul 15, 2026Correction
Press Freedom category
Sixty-seven documents were dropped from the Press Freedom category by a relevance filter; a fresh holdout week showed no false drops.67Unrelated documents had been routed into the category and were contaminating its counts; the filter was adjudicated document by document (50 of 50 labels agreed) before it shipped.543544DECISIONS-ARCHIVE.md