Monitoring democratic institutions through public records
Are career government workers protected from being fired for political reasons? 'Schedule F' is a rule that could let the President fire thousands of workers who aren't loyal to him.
AI content assessment elevated
AI content assessment elevated with high P2 concern rate. Warrants close examination.
On February 6, 2026, the Office of Personnel Management published a final rule titled Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service that creates a new category of federal employment called "Schedule Policy/Career." Under this rule, career government employees in positions deemed "policy-influencing" can be reclassified as at-will workers, meaning they can be fired without the procedural protections and appeal rights that currently apply. The same day, OPM proposed a separate rule on Suitability Action Appeals that would remove employees' ability to challenge certain removal decisions before an independent review board, instead having OPM review its own decisions.
This might matter because the federal merit system — the set of rules that prevents government workers from being hired or fired based on political loyalty — has been a cornerstone of American governance since the 1880s. If broadly applied, these rules could allow the removal of thousands of career employees without independent review of whether the firing was for legitimate performance reasons or political retaliation. The rule itself states that positions can be reclassified specifically for "increasing accountability to the President," which could represent a notable departure from the principle that career civil servants serve the public rather than any individual officeholder.
The administration argues these changes are needed because it is too difficult to fire poor-performing federal employees — a complaint shared across administrations of both parties, and one supported by government audits. Streamlining this process could lead to more efficient and effective government operations. The rule also requires agencies to maintain internal policies against prohibited personnel practices, and positions would still be filled through nonpartisan hiring. Importantly, the rule went through the standard notice-and-comment process, allowing public input and creating a formal record. These are reasonable points: performance management in the federal government has long been criticized as slow and ineffective. However, critics note that removing external appeal rights — particularly access to the Merit Systems Protection Board — reduces the key independent check on whether terminations are truly performance-based.
Separately, a House resolution (HR 1035) condemning workforce reductions at FEMA and a Senate floor speech discussing fired FBI agents and whistleblower protections point to a broader pattern of tension around federal workforce management.
Limitations: This analysis is AI-generated and based on a small number of documents (16), which limits statistical reliability. The main rule takes effect March 9, 2026, and may face legal challenges. How many positions are actually reclassified will determine whether the practical impact is narrow or sweeping.